My calculus about everything being counted, kept, known or something else? For the first, I’ve been thinking about that a lot, and I do think—I’m not sure if this is how you mean things on Mu, but the process of telling and retelling stories does keep things, but not all things, and not without them being transformed or shifted. I think. Hm.
I don’t know how much Zvahr Yhjrn told you about what I told her about the Mask and how it works, but much like your Fathom, the Mask archives all the memories of Almachadta, going back to … not quite the very beginning, but close to. The line of Sword-Saints is not quite unbroken, but there’s very few ruptures—usually someone was always bearing the Mask. That is a staggering amount of memory. You know how Mu deals with it—the Grasps, and then the Grasp of Grasps, with the original records preserved. The Mask deals with it by choosing. The further back you go, the murkier things get. Certain details stand out—advances that were particularly valuable, or mistakes there were particularly instructive—but other things are lost. Who people were, especially. A project I’ve been … picking at … is trying to find the names and stories of the Sword-Saints before me. It’s been an extremely qualified success.
I suppose I say all that because I think it explains how I, at least, understand what can be remembered, and what can be made into a story and thus told. I think stories can carry many important things. I think even who we are are stories that we tell ourselves and others, more than anything objective or eternal. But I think even the act of telling a story is … the act of, as I said, obliterating certain details for rendering it legible? Maybe they don’t necessarily have to be lost? Maybe another story could carry them? But I think there’s so much distance in the interpretation of language and action and … everything, really, that we’re constantly losing things, even things that matter? And to me, it’s important to accept that loss, acknowledge it, and live within it anyway.
I also recognize that all of this is highly contingent on … my own understanding, very specifically. Much of my Clan will tell you I talk a lot, and that isn’t untrue, but I spent a very long time keeping my own counsel. In some ways, it’s … still an unfamiliar joy to be able to share these thoughts with other people, who can challenge and refine them.
Which is to say, you’re welcome to disagree with any of that.
I did ask myself what conversation I thought you would want me to have had with her. I looked up at the tapestry you wove me several times, in the course of that conversation. I wonder if she noticed?
Oh. Thank you. That is … that means very much to me as well. I don’t know if I have anything thoughtful to say about it, but. I guess …
Qarina immediately wanted to be my friend, and shared things about her brother with me. Dyu taught me something I could have never learned on my own and also let me meet his friend. They both were so immediately open-hearted and genuine, how could someone not adore them both? And they did, of course, save our lives. That isn’t nothing.
Do the other planes consider themselves to be aligned with one or another type of gnosis, themselves, or is this an ontology you’ve placed upon them by observation of more than one?
And this is where you have flummoxed me. That is an ontology I’ve placed upon them by observation, and assumptions made based off … the fact that there are five gnosis types, and five planes.
On each of the four planes we’ve been to, the people native to that plane, aside from ourselves, have spoken with gnosis resonance that matches that plane’s perceived nature. I don’t know if Wolf or Jorule shared any of them with you? The people of Almachadta speak with flourishing resonance. The people of Samudra speak with pellucid resonance. The people of the Beast speak with burning resonance. The people of Mu speak with radiant resonance. I don’t know if you can hear it once pointed out; after her moment out in the desert, Qarina stopped speaking with radiant resonance. Most of us don’t speak with any particular resonance either. So that is one factor.
The next factor would be that Almachadta, Samudra, and the Beast all have been very clearly and intensively drenched in their assumed gnosis. One of the things the Sword-Saints learned early about Almachadta was that it was a certain overage of flourishing gnosis that began the end of our plane. We’ve known we could combat it with burning and pellucid, but we could never draw enough burning and pellucid. The ambient flourishing gnosis on Almachadta is much stronger than any other gnosis-type, though other types are not absent.
The same seems to be the case on both Samudra and the Beast. On Samudra, there was an event where an anchored island was created by the application of enough burning and flourishing gnosis meshing with the extant pellucid atmosphere. The mechanism of how that happened is still … somewhat opaque to me (and while I hadn’t intended it to be so, the island was a result of the externalization of some of my internal issues at the time; I can. Explain that. In more depth. At some point).
For the Beast and its relationship with burning gnosis, my evidence is thinner, but I was working on spinning a significant amount of the Beast’s gnosis into wool, and then weaving with it, and the outcome was a textile that was mostly burning in nature.
On Mu, I don’t think any of stopped and did much gnosis-work at all, which, in retrospect, was an oversight. The sun emits flourishing, burning, and pellucid gnosis in scalding amounts, and I don’t think the sand is suffused with any kind of gnosis at all, though I would have to double-check with Archie. I encountered radiant gnosis in Dyu’s healing, and several other workings, but not ambiently.
Additionally, and I don’t know if Wolf told you about this, but there is a sixth type of gnosis called “liminal.” This is where the resonance we call “aletheic” comes from: It sounds, as I believe you’ve been informed of, like this. There’s a truth-sense to it, though it is not necessarily truth. Liminal itself is … about defying systematization, so I’m not sure how accurately I could explain it, though I associate with points-of-view that are multiple and refracting?
I apologize. My own understanding of any gnosis is … heavily inflected by my experiences; I have no formal training the way some of the others do, so please take what I have to say as, again, highly subjective.
I asked Caion, the head of Samudra’s Academy and Archie’s partner, about if Samudra has ever conceived of itself as self-consciously “pellucid” and he said he hadn’t considered it as such, but in retrospect, it doesn’t not fit. I’m going to explain the content of our conversation here and see if he has any insights. I will also ask Jae, the Scorpion Queen of the Beast, about her thoughts (she’s angelsGuignol on here because she is ridiculous and cannot simply use her name).
At any rate, thank you for the challenge here! It’s a lot to think about and I think it will be fruitful. If you have any sense of where radiance stems from on Mu, or even how you’ve conceived of the gnosis-makeup of your own world, I would value them immensely.